Oct, 1, 2023

Vol.30 No.2, pp. 84-88


Review

  • Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry
  • Volume 6(2); 1999
  • Article

Review

Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry 1999;6(2):176-88. Published online: Feb, 1, 1999

Effects of Alcohol on Neurocognitive Function, Psychomotor Performance and Subjective Response in Koreans with Different ALDH2 Genotypes

  • Il-Seon Shin, MD1;Jin-Sang Yoon, MD1;Hyun Kim, MD1;Bo-Hyun Yoon, MD2;Hoon Lee, MD3;Jae-Sung Jung, PhD4; and Hyung-Yung Lee, MD1;
    1;Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Kwangju, 2;Biological Psychiatry, Research Unit, Naju National Mental Hospial, Chonnam, 3;St. john of Gob Mental Hospital, Kwangju, 4;Department of Biology, Sunchon National Universiry, Chonnam, Korea
Abstract

Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of alcohol on neurocognitive function, psychomotor performance and subjective response in healthy Korean adults with different ALDH2 genotypes.

Method:A total of 24 males, half with active ALDH2*1/2*1 and the other with inactive ALDH2*1/2*2, was selected through genotyping using restriction fragment length polymorphism. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over design, each subject consumed 0.5g/kg dose of alcohol, given as a mixture of 40% vodka and orange juice, and placebo(orange juice) on two separate occasions on an average of weekly intervals. The blood alcohol concentrations(BACs) were measured using a breath analyzer at baseline and at 30, 60 minutes after drinking. P300s were measured at baseline and at 30 minutes after alcohol and placebo intake. Vital signs and psychomotor performance[Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold(CFFT), Choice Reaction Time(CRT), Digit Symbol Substitution(DSS)] were measured at baseline and at 60 minutes after alcohol and placebo intake. Subjective responses were measured at the end of the study. The statistical analysis focused on whether there were any differences between groups with different ALDH2 genotypes.

Results:The major results are as follows. 1) BACs in the inactive group were overall equivalent to those in the active group. Only in terms of time, BACs were significantly higher overall at 30 minutes than at 60 minutes after alcohol intake. 2) Pulse rates were significantly increased after alcohol intake compared with placebo, and the increase was greater in the inactive than in the active group. 3) P300 latencies in leads Fz(frontal), Cz(cental) and Pz(parietal) were significantly increased after alcohol intake compared to placebo, and the increase was greater in the inactive than in the active group. P300 amplitudes in leads Cz and Pz were significantly decreased overall after alcohol intake compared to placebo. 4) Compared with placebo, alcohol produced significant effect on the psychomotor performance:impairment in the inactive group, improvement in the active group.5) Compared with placebo, alcohol significantly induced a negative or an intense effect on the subjective responses in the inactive group, but little negative and even a somewhat positive effect in the active group.

Conclusions:These results suggest that ALDH isozyme variance might be an important factor to determine the effects of acute dose of alcohol on the various psychobehavioural functions and also to determine the alcohol use pattern and to predict the future development of alcohol overuse and/or abuse.

Keywords Alcohol;ALDH2;P300;Psychomotor performance;Subjective response.