- Past Issues
- e-Submission
-
2021 Impact Factor 1.766
5-Year Impact Factor 1.674
Editorial Office
- +82-01-9989-7744
- kbiolpsychiatry@gmail.com
- https://www.biolpsychiatry.or.kr/
2021 Impact Factor 1.766
5-Year Impact Factor 1.674
Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry 2000;7(2):198-205. Published online: Feb, 1, 2000
Objectives:Risperidone and clozapine belong to a new generation of antipsychotics that are reportedly more effective and better tolerated than conventional neuroleptics. However, each of these agents costs far more per unit than conventional neuroleptics. The purpose of our retrospective study was to ascertain the total cost and effectiveness of treatment before and after administration of risperidone and clozapine in “revolving door” schizophrenia patients.
Method:Data collected on revolving door schizophrenics for 2 years before clozapine and risperidone treatment and for at least 2 years after clozapine and risperidone treatment. Direct cost of inpatient and outpatient treatment was measured. Effectiveness was scaled as “years of mild disability gained”.
Result:Both risperidone and cloazpine result in higher costs and additional benefits to patients, for example, increased mild disability, reduced number of relapse, and reduced hospital length-of-stay. An ICER of risperidone was less than Rc and ICER of clozapine was greater than Rc. According to decision-analytic this model, risperidone had favorable cost-effectiveness ratios relative to clozapine.
Conclusion:We have assumed that risperidone is more cost-effective than clozapine.
Keywords Risperidone;Clozapine;Cost-effectiveness.