Oct, 1, 2023

Vol.30 No.2, pp. 84-88


Review

  • Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry
  • Volume 25(1); 2018
  • Article

Review

Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry 2018;25(1):16-20. Published online: Jan, 1, 2018

Investigation into the Possible Genetic Role of Serotonin and Dopamine Transporters in Psychological Resilience

  • Sang Hyun Cho, MD1;Jae Kyung Chung, MD2;Yang Weon Bang, MD3; and Eun-Jeong Joo, MD1,4;
    1;Department of Psychiatry, Eulji University, Nowon Eulji Meical Center, Seoul, 2;Department of Psychiatry, Eumsung-somang Hospital, Eumsung, 3;Department of Psychiatry, Keyo Hospital, Uiwang, 4;Department of Neuropsychiatry, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daegeon, Korea
Abstract

Objectives : Psychological resilience is the ability to cope with stress. The genetic background behind psychological resilience is not much known. The serotonin transporter and dopamine transporter are implicated in stress related psychology and emotional processing. The aim of this study is to investigate a possible genetic role of functional polymorphisms of serotonin and dopamine transporters for psychological resilience.

Methods : A total of 951 healthy adult subjects were included. Psychological resilience was measured using Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Genotyping was performed for serotonin transporter gene (SERT) promoter variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) and dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) 3'-untranslated region (UTR) VNTR. Genetic association analysis was conducted between genotypes and the CD-RISC score.

Results : No genetic association was observed for SERT promoter VNTR or DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR with CD-RISC score. No genetic interaction between SERT promoter VNTR and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR with CD-RISC score was detected.

Conclusions : Either serotonin or dopamine transporter did not seem to play a significant role for psychological resilience in this sample.

Keywords CD-RISC;Dopamine;Gene;Psychological resilience;Serotonin.

Full Text

Address for correspondence: Eun-Jeong Joo, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Eulji University, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, 68 Hangeulbiseok-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01830, Korea
Tel: +82-2-970-8611, Fax: +82-2-949-2356, E-mail: jej1303@gmail.com

Introduction


Psychological resilience is a measure of the ability to cope with stress and adversity. It is a complex trait determined by multiple factors interacting with each other including genetic, biological, psychological, and environmental factors.1)2)3)4) Psychological resilience is associated with positive affect and self-esteem,5) and has been shown to moderate the relationship between environmental adversity and an individual's psychiatric symptoms. For example, the relationship between childhood maltreatment and current psychiatric symptoms was reported to be moderated by psychological resilience.1) Psychological resilience is also associated with reduced psychopathology6) and may act as a protective factor against the development of mood disorders.7) However, there have been few studies regarding which genes are responsible for psychological resilience. Two genes in nitric oxide pathway, Nitric oxide synthase adapter protein (NOS1AP) and NOS1 have been studied and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of these genes were associated with resilience.8) Another genetic study on tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) could not find association between a SNP rs1800629 and resilience.9)
Serotonin has been strongly considered to be an important neurotransmitter depressive mood and stress. Especially, the repeat polymorphism in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene (SERT) is thought to be associated with depression and anxiety-related conditions.2)10)11)12) Dopamine is associated with personality, emotionality, cognitive processing, and regulation of reward.13)14)15) These characteristics are all related to stress management of human being in general. The variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) is known to much influential to DAT1 function.16)
Based on the above previously studied relationship between serotonergic and dopaminergic neuronal pathways and mood as well as vulnerability to stress, we hypothesized a possible genetic role for the serotonin transporter and dopamine transporter on psychological resilience in general population. In this study, we aim to evaluate the possible role of 44bp VNTR at the promoter of the SERT and 40 bp VNTR at the 3'-UTR of the DAT1 polymorphisms in Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) score in a group of healthy adult subjects. Up to our knowledge, these polymorphisms have not been studied for genetic association with psychological resilience.

Methods

Subjects
We selected subjects who had completed the CD-RISC from the pool of normal subjects who participated in our previous studies.17)18) All subjects were recruited from college students, nurses, and fire and public protection officers. Each subject completed a brief psychiatric interview performed by a psychiatric research nurse to evaluate current and past psychiatric illnesses. Subjects with a lifetime history of major psychiatric illness and/or brain trauma were excluded. All subjects were ethnically Korean. The final analyses of the present study included 951 subjects. It consists of 346 nurses, 391 college students, and 214 fire and public protection officers. All subjects understood the study purpose and signed a written informed consent form. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Eulji General Hospital (201103-01).

Measurement of psychological resilience
To measure psychological resilience, we used the original version of the CD-RISC translated in Korean, which includes 25 items rated on a 5-point scale from 0-4. The maximum CD-RISC score is 100, and the higher the score the better the resilience.19) It is a self-administered scale that comprehensively asks about aspects of psychological resilience. A Korean version of CD-RISC has been developed and shown to have good reliability and validity.17)20)

Genotyping of the SERT promoter and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR polymorphism
DeoxyriboNucleic Acid (DNA) was extracted from blood, and genotyping of SERT promoter VNTR and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR polymorphisms was done as described in our previous publications.18)21) There have been S (short) , L (long) alleles for SERT and 5 different alleles (6, 7, 9, 10, 11R) for DAT1 found. Genotypes were classified as SS, SL, and LL for SERT promoter VNTR and single copy of 10 repeat (10R), double copies of 10R, and no copy of 10R for DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR.

Statistical analysis
Age was found to be significantly correlated with CD-RISC total score (r = -0.069, p < 0.033), so an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to compare the scores of the three different genotype groups of each gene. Individual genetic roles of SERT promoter VNTR and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR and their genetic interaction were analyzed. p-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed by Chi-square goodness-of-fit test. SPSS 12.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all analyses. Power calculations were performed by G*Power 3.19 (Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany).

Results

Information about the age, CD-RISC score, allele frequencies and genotype frequencies regarding gender was provided in Table 1. No association was detected between the CD-RISC total score and SERT promoter VNTR genotype, or between the CD-RISC total score and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR genotype. Additionally, no significant interaction was observed between SERT promoter VNTR and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR on CD-RISC score (Table 2). The mean age was 25.86 ± 6.66. The CD-RISC total score was 63.63 ± 14.73. Our sample was satisfied for DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR (χ2 = 9.005, df = 2, p > 0.05), but was not satisfied for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for SERT promoter VNTR (χ2 = 20.07, df = 2, p < 0.05). Power calculation estimated that our sample size has power of 0.80 under the assumption of small effect size (0.1) and α error probability 0.05.

Discussion

Psychological resilience is a complex phenotype that may include personality, self-image, mood, anxiety, and ability of adjustment.5) It acts as a protective factor against maladjustment, stress vulnerability, and even psychiatric illnesses.6)7) Serotonin and dopamine are well-studied neurotransmitters associated with mood disorders, and serotonin and dopamine transporters control serotonergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission. In the present study, we focused on the serotonin, and DAT1, and investigated their common functional polymorphisms (SERT promoter VNTR and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR) for possible associations with psychological resilience.
The SERT (SLC6A4) gene is located at chromosome 17q11-12. A recent meta-analysis of 54 studies found that the S allele was linked with an increased risk of depression under conditions of stress.12) A 44-bp insertion/deletion VNTR polymorphism is located upstream of the transcription initiation site, and the most common alleles are a long allele (16 repeats) and a short allele (14 repeats). The S allele has a lower transcriptional efficiency than the L allele,22)23) and typically exhibits a greater degree of vulnerability to social stressors.2)11)
The DAT1 (or SLC6A3) is important in the regulation of dopamine levels in the brain.24) DAT1 has also been shown to play a role in the development of depression,25)26) attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder, and substance use disorder.27)28)29) It is located at chromosome 5p15. It has a common 40 bp VNTR polymorphism in its 3'-UTR, for which the most frequent allele in the population is 10R allele. The 10R allele is associated with an increased level of DAT1 expression,16)30)31) and is a risk-conferring allele for ADHD.32) Additionally, the 10R/10R genotype is associated with higher DAT1 density and lower dopamine expression in the synapse.16) Several studies have investigated possible associations between DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR and psychiatric phenotypes, although the findings are heterogenous.33)34)
There have been previously two other studies about CD-RISC for non-clinical subjects. The CD-RISC score (63.59 ± 14.77) in our study was slightly lower (65.9 ± 13.6) than that for the general population in the previous study.20) Another recent study reported a 25-item CD-RISC score of 61.2 ± 13.3 in 1794 hospital employees in Korea.35) Altogether, it seems that CD-RISC score is getting lower with aging and hospital employees have tendency of low CD-RISC score.
Contrary to our hypothesis based on the known functional difference of specific polymorphic alleles, we found no significant association between SERT promoter VNTR or DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR and psychological resilience in our sample. This could be explained in many ways. First, the polymorphic sites may not be representative of the entire serotonin or DAT1, and alternative polymorphic sites in these genes may show significant associations with psychological resilience. Second, the complexity of the psychological resilience phenotype involves many aspects of brain function. Therefore, it is more likely that multiple genes with small to moderate effects interact together, and that any genetic effect of SERT promoter VNTR and/or DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR is too small to detect with our relatively small sample. In this study we tried to explore a possible interaction between SERT promoter VNTR and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR, and found a marginally significant result (p = 0.051) (Table 2). This result may suggest a possible genetic interaction between these polymorphisms. However, this finding is inconclusive. Further study with large sample is definitely required. Third, serotonin and dopamine may not contribute sufficiently to psychological resilience to be detected as influential. It is possible that other neurotransmitters systems function individually and interactively, so these should be investigated for their possible association with psychological resilience in future studies.
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the present results. First, the total sample size was not sufficiently large to provide appropriate statistical power and it may cause the deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for SERT promoter VNTR. Another possible cause of deviation of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for SERT promoter VNTR would be the specific characteristics of our sample. Since subjects were recruited from college students, nurses, and fire and public protection officers, this sample would be genetically deviated from general population. Second, our non-clinical subjects did not represent the general population because it derived from nursing staff, nursing students, and fire and public protection officers. Finally, as mentioned above, we were unable to investigate multiple polymorphic sites because of limited resources, so we selected SERT promoter VNTR and DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR as well-known functional polymorphic sites. However, these were not representative of the entire DNA sequence.
In conclusion, the present findings suggest that the SERT promoter VNTR and/or DAT1 3'-UTR VNTR genotypes do not play a significant role in psychological resilience. However, it is likely that many genes interact together to affect the complex trait of psychological resilience, further studies on other candidate genes using larger samples are warranted to fully understand the possible common genetic influence on psychological resilience as a complex phenotype.

REFERENCES

  1. Campbell-Sills L, Cohan SL, Stein MB. Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behav Res Ther 2006;44:585-599.

  2. Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE, Taylor A, Craig IW, Harrington H, et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 2003;301:386-389.

  3. Charney DS. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:195-216.

  4. Haskett ME, Nears K, Ward CS, McPherson AV. Diversity in adjustment of maltreated children: factors associated with resilient functioning. Clin Psychol Rev 2006;26:796-812.

  5. Benetti C, Kambouropoulos N. Affect-regulated indirect effects of trait anxiety and trait resilience on self-esteem. Pers Individ Dif 2006;41:341-352.

  6. Sexton MB, Hamilton L, McGinnis EW, Rosenblum KL, Muzik M. The roles of resilience and childhood trauma history: main and moderating effects on postpartum maternal mental health and functioning. J Affect Disord 2015;174:562-568.

  7. Sharpley CF, Christie DRH, Bitsika V, Andronicos NM, Agnew LL, McMillan ME. Does psychological resilience buffer against the link between the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and depression following stress. Physiol Behav 2017;180:53-59.

  8. Bruenig D, Morris CP, Mehta D, Harvey W, Lawford B, Young RM, et al. Nitric oxide pathway genes (NOS1AP and NOS1) are involved in PTSD severity, depression, anxiety, stress and resilience. Gene 2017;625:42-48.

  9. Bruenig D, Mehta D, Morris CP, Harvey W, Lawford B, Young RM, et al. Genetic and serum biomarker evidence for a relationship between TNFα and PTSD in Vietnam war combat veterans. Compr Psychiatry 2017;74:125-133.

  10. Clarke H, Flint J, Attwood AS, Munafò MR. Association of the 5- HTTLPR genotype and unipolar depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2010;40:1767-1778.

  11. Grabe HJ, Lange M, Wolff B, Völzke H, Lucht M, Freyberger HJ, et al. Mental and physical distress is modulated by a polymorphism in the 5-HT transporter gene interacting with social stressors and chronic disease burden. Mol Psychiatry 2005;10:220-224.

  12. Karg K, Burmeister M, Shedden K, Sen S. The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited evidence of genetic moderation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:444-454.

  13. Garcia-Garcia M, Clemente I, Domínguez-Borràs J, Escera C. Dopamine transporter regulates the enhancement of novelty processing by a negative emotional context. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:1483-1488.

  14. Greenwood TA, Alexander M, Keck PE, McElroy S, Sadovnick AD, Remick RA, et al. Segmental linkage disequilibrium within the dopamine transporter gene. Mol Psychiatry 2002;7:165-173.

  15. Mehler-Wex C, Riederer P, Gerlach M. Dopaminergic dysbalance in distinct basal ganglia neurocircuits: implications for the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurotox Res 2006;10:167-179.

  16. Heinz A, Goldman D, Jones DW, Palmour R, Hommer D, Gorey JG, et al. Genotype influences in vivo dopamine transporter availability in human striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology 2000;22:133-139.

  17. Baek HS, Lee KU, Joo EJ, Lee MY, Choi KS. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the connor-davidson resilience scale. Psychiatry Investig 2010;7:109-115.

  18. Eun TK, Jeong SH, Lee KY, Kim SH, Ahn YM, Bang YW, et al. Association between the 5-HTTLPR genotype and childhood characteristics in mood disorders. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2016;14:88-95.

  19. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003;18:76-82.

  20. Jung YE, Min JA, Shin AY, Han SY, Lee KU, Kim TS, et al. The Korean version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: an extended validation. Stress Health 2012;28:319-326.

  21. Jeong SH, Choi KS, Lee KY, Kim EJ, Kim YS, Joo EJ. Association between the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-related traits in healthy adults. Psychiatr Genet 2015;25:119-126.

  22. Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S, Seemann M, Bengel D, Balling U, et al. Functional promoter and polyadenylation site mapping of the human serotonin (5-HT) transporter gene. J Neural Transm Gen Sect 1995;102:247-254.

  23. Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S, Stöber G, Riederer P, Bengel D, et al. Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. J Neurochem 1996;66:2621-2624.

  24. Greenwood TA, Schork NJ, Eskin E, Kelsoe JR. Identification of additional variants within the human dopamine transporter gene provides further evidence for an association with bipolar disorder in two independent samples. Mol Psychiatry 2006;11:125-133, 115.

  25. Brunswick DJ, Amsterdam JD, Mozley PD, Newberg A. Greater availability of brain dopamine transporters in major depression shown by [99mTc]TRODAT-1 SPECT imaging. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:1836-1841.

  26. Haeffel GJ, Getchell M, Koposov RA, Yrigollen CM, Deyoung CG, Klinteberg BA, et al. Association between polymorphisms in the dopamine transporter gene and depression: evidence for a gene-environment interaction in a sample of juvenile detainees. Psychol Sci 2008;19:62-69.

  27. Gizer IR, Ficks C, Waldman ID. Candidate gene studies of ADHD: a meta-analytic review. Hum Genet 2009;126:51-90.

  28. Keikhaee MR, Fadai F, Sargolzaee MR, Javanbakht A, Najmabadi H, Ohadi M. Association analysis of the dopamine transporter (DAT1)-67A/T polymorphism in bipolar disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2005;135B:47-49.

  29. van der Zwaluw CS, Engels RC, Buitelaar J, Verkes RJ, Franke B, Scholte RH. Polymorphisms in the dopamine transporter gene (SLC6A3/DAT1) and alcohol dependence in humans: a systematic review. Pharmacogenomics 2009;10:853-866.

  30. Fuke S, Suo S, Takahashi N, Koike H, Sasagawa N, Ishiura S. The VNTR polymorphism of the human dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene affects gene expression. Pharmacogenomics J 2001;1:152-156.

  31. Mill J, Asherson P, Browes C, D'Souza U, Craig I. Expression of the dopamine transporter gene is regulated by the 3' UTR VNTR: evidence from brain and lymphocytes using quantitative RT-PCR. Am J Med Genet 2002;114:975-979.

  32. Lim MH, Kim HW, Paik KC, Cho SC, Yoon DY, Lee HJ. Association of the DAT1 polymorphism with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a family-based approach. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2006;141B:309-311.

  33. Huang CC, Lu RB, Shih MC, Yen CH, Huang SY. Association study of the dopamine transporter gene with personality traits and major depressive disorder in the Han Chinese population. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2011;21:94-97.

  34. Opmeer EM, Kortekaas R, Aleman A. Depression and the role of genes involved in dopamine metabolism and signalling. Prog Neurobiol 2010;92:112-133.

  35. Jeon HJ, Bang YR, Park HY, Kim SA, Yoon IY. Differential effects of circadian typology on sleep-related symptoms, physical fatigue and psychological well-being in relation to resilience. Chronobiol Int 2017;34:677-686.